One of the things I would say now, we have peace in Northern Ireland now, I`m glad we did, but the things we did during the negotiations in the way we dealt with the IRA, I wouldn`t have done it. There is a moral question as to whether a person involved in terrorism should be in power, and I found that very difficult to bear. This British Government is lip service to the Good Friday Agreement and has abandoned any pretext of being non-partisan or even bound by its principles. The British shamelessly declared that they would violate international law and international law. While this is not a surprise to Irish Republicans, the promotion of this position as a virtue has shocked some members of the international community. The Scottish Brexit campaigner said the deal was a “rigged referendum”, a “deadly horror” and “a humiliation of our army, police and parliament”. Almost all of our editions go to the people who make the content of The Canary. Thus, your contribution directly supports our editors and allows us to continue to do what we do: tell the truth, pushed by you. We have survived many attempts to silence ourselves and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and the right-wing mainstream media. Gove`s views were “a fanatical unionist protest against the deal,” said Brendan O`Leary, a professor of political science at the University of Pennsylvania and an adviser to the British Labor Party and the Irish government in the years leading up to the signing of the agreement in 1998. “There are people who naturally felt like me, discomfort, there is a moral question about whether someone who has been involved in terrorism should be in power, and I found that very difficult to bear. The Good Friday Agreement, also known as the Belfast Agreement, requires the British government to act with “rigorous impartiality on behalf of all peoples in the diversity of their identities and traditions.” “After Loughgall and Drumnakilly, the government had become cautious and concerned about the shooting allegations,” he said. Gove wrote: “The Belfast Agreement poses a threat not only to the Britishness of Northern Ireland, but also to the British way of doing things in terms of law, equal opportunities, police and human rights.
However, the Belfast agreement has even greater malice at its core. It is a capitulation to violence, a confirmation of terrorism, which has led to a “demilitarization” – the withdrawal of the British army from our territory – which is presented as the equivalent of a “dismantling” – the transfer of illegally detained criminal arsenals. The moral flaw of such a process will prove difficult to address. It is a humiliation of our army, the police and Parliament. But worse, it is a denial of our national integrity, in the true sense of the word. In the pamphlet published by the right-wing think tank Centre for Policy Studies, Gove described the deal as a “Trojan horse.” Peace in Northern Ireland is, as Major put it, “fragile”. The British Government should do everything in its power to support the peace process. But Gove`s pamphlet shows that at least one member of the Conservative government does not support this process. And with conservatives seemingly determined to risk long-term peace for their own short-term gain, the country urgently needs to raise its voice. Peace in Northern Ireland depends on the impartiality of the British government. The Good Friday Agreement [paywall] requires it. But in 2000, one of Theresa May`s cabinet ministers, Michael Gove, wrote a 17,000-word pamphlet against the Good Friday agreement, calling the peace process a “moral flaw.” And this reveals a serious lack of impartiality in the ranks of the Conservatives.
The Conservative government`s plans to strike a deal with Northern Ireland`s Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) have sparked a public outcry. On the 17th. In June, protesters gathered in Downing Street to protest any deal. And political figures, from former British Prime Minister John Major to recent Irish Prime Minister Enda Kenny, have warned that a deal could jeopardise the peace process. Conservative leader Michael Gove said the peace process in Northern Ireland was a “moral horror” and a “humiliation” Gove described the peace process as a “moral horror”, a “humiliation”, a “denial of our national integrity” and “an indelible sign against [our government]”. The pamphlet depicts the peace process as a capitulation to the IRA. We published nearly 2,000 articles and more than 50 films in 2021. And we want to do that and more in 2022, but we don`t have enough money to continue at that pace. So, if you appreciate our work and want us to continue, then join us and be part of the Canarian family. The British Justice Minister had also repeatedly expressed concerns about the “erosion” of British culture in Northern Ireland. Deal or No Deal: The countdown to Brexit continues as the deadline for Europe`s crash draws closer and closer.
More information can be found here. The Belfast Agreement was, as he put it, “a Trojan horse” for democratic reform throughout the UK. It introduces proportional representation. Shockingly, it “enshrines a vision of human rights that privileges competing minorities at the expense of the democratic majority.” Worse still, “it offers social and economic rights.” profoundly disregards the 1998 peace agreement. Gove called the entire peace process nothing more than a capitulation to the IRA. He insisted that the cause of the unrest was Britain`s lack of determination to fend off demands for a united Ireland. This is idiocy, but, like Gove`s Brexit theorems, dangerous idiocy. The full text of the document shows that this is patently false.
“ONE OF THE CLAIMS IN THIS ARTICLE IS THAT, EVEN THOUGH IT CHALLENGES NORTHERN IRELAND OUTSIDE THE UK, IT ACTS AS A LABORATORY FOR THE POLICY DEVELOPMENTS THAT NEW LABOUR WANTS TO INTRODUCE ACROSS THE UK. AND WITH THE ARGUMENT THAT THE VALIDITY OF A POLICE FORCE DEPENDS ON ITS ETHNIC COMPOSITION, THE PATTEN REPORT IS AN ELEMENT OF THE MACPHERSON REPORT, IT IS PARADOXICAL THAT MR PATTEN, WHO NOW SUPPORTS APPOINTMENT TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION ON THE BASIS OF MERIT AND NOT NATIONALITY OR ETHNICITY, WANTS THE RUC TO USE THE METHODS THAT THE COMMISSION HAS HAD TO ABANDON, BECAUSE THEY PROMOTED CORRUPTION. Michael Gove wrote a 58-page document in which he attacked the Good Friday Agreement, compared it to appeasing the Nazis, and even managed to attack the rights of trans people, women and the disabled. It was a shamefully irresponsible pamphlet at the time, and it is not only in retrospect that people should consider this man`s profound inability to oversee a difficult period in British-Irish relations,” said O`Leary, who has worked on some aspects of the d`Hondt system in Northern Ireland and on police reform. Conservative Leader Michael Gove said last night that he believed the negotiations on the Good Friday agreement “could have been handled differently”. “THE MERE FACT OF ACCEPTING THE IRA`S `PEACE` OFFER ON ITS TERMS IS SUBVERSIVE TO THE BASIC LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF IRELAND AND SUBVERSIVE TO NORTHERN IRELAND`S POSITION WITHIN THE UNITED KINGDOM. IN EXCHANGE FOR THE IRA`S “CONCESSION”, THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT INVITED SINN FEIN BACK TO THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH, PROMISED TO ADVANCE THE DISMANTLING OF THE RUC, ADVANCE HUMAN RIGHTS AND EQUALITY AGENDAS THAT PROMOTE REPUBLICAN ASPIRATIONS, ACCELERATE THE DEMILITARISATION OF NORTHERN IRELAND, AGREE TO PRIORITISE THE IRISH LANGUAGE AND SPEED UP THE REMOVAL OF SYMBOLS THAT CONFIRMED NORTHERN IRELAND`S ENDURING BRITISH IDENTITY. Gove isn`t the only one who thinks so.
.
